Your browser doesn't support javascript.
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 6 de 6
Filter
1.
Arch Bone Jt Surg ; 10(1): 23-31, 2022 Jan.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-1836299

ABSTRACT

Background: This study assessed the impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on acute upper limb referrals and operative case-mix at the beginning and ease of British lockdown. Methods: A longitudinal multicentre observational cohort study was conducted for both upper limb trauma referrals and operative case-mix over a 12-week period (6 weeks from the beginning and 6 weeks from the ease of the national lockdown). Statistical analysis included median (± median absolute deviation), risk and odds ratios, and Fisher's exact test to calculate the statistical significance, set at p ≤ 0.05. Results: There was a 158% (n = 456 vs. 177) increase in upper limb referrals and 133% (n = 91 vs. 39) increase in the operative trauma caseload at the ease of lockdown compared with its commencement. An increase in sporting injuries was demonstrated (p=0.02), specifically cycling (p=0.004, OR=2.58). A significant increase in COVID-19 testing was demonstrated during the ease of lockdown (p=0.0001) with more patients having their management changed during the beginning of the pandemic (9.6% vs. 0.7%, p=0.0001). Of these patients, 47% went on to have delayed surgery within 6 months. No patients who underwent surgery tested positive for COVID-19 infection within 14 days post-operatively and no mortalities were recorded at 30 days. Conclusion: The ease of lockdown has seen upper limb referrals and operations more than double compared to early lockdown. With no patients testing positive for COVID-19 within 14 days of the procedure, this demonstrates that having upper limb surgery during the current pandemic is safe.

2.
BMJ Open ; 12(1): e054919, 2022 01 18.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-1638096

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE: This is the first British multicentre study observing the impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on orthopaedic trauma with respect to referrals, operative caseload and mortality during its peak. DESIGN: A longitudinal, multicentre, retrospective, observational, cohort study was conducted during the peak 6 weeks of the first wave from 17 March 2020 compared with the same period in 2019. SETTING: Hospitals from six major urban cities were recruited around the UK, including London. PARTICIPANTS: A total of 4840 clinical encounters were initially recorded. 4668 clinical encounters were analysed post-exclusion. PRIMARY AND SECONDARY OUTCOME MEASURES: Primary outcomes included the number of acute trauma referrals and those undergoing operative intervention, mortality rates and the proportion of patients contracting COVID-19. Secondary outcomes consisted of the mechanism of injury, type of operative intervention and proportion of aerosolising-generating anaesthesia used. RESULTS: During the COVID-19 period, there was a 34% reduction in acute orthopaedic trauma referrals compared with 2019 (1792 down to 1183 referrals), and a 29.5% reduction in surgical interventions (993 down to 700 operations). The mortality rate was more than doubled for both risk and odds ratios during the COVID-19 period for all referrals (1.3% vs 3.8%, p=0.0005) and for those undergoing operative intervention (2.2% vs 4.9%, p=0.004). Moreover, mortality due to COVID-19-related complications (vs non-COVID-19 causes) had greater odds by a factor of at least 20 times. For the operative cohort during COVID-19, there was an increase in odds of aerosolising-generating anaesthesia (including those with superimposed regional blocks) by three-quarters, as well as doubled odds of a consultant acting as the primary surgeon. CONCLUSION: Although there was a reduction of acute trauma referrals and those undergoing operative intervention, the mortality rate still more than doubled in odds during the peak of the pandemic compared with the same time interval 1 year ago.


Subject(s)
COVID-19 , Orthopedics , Cohort Studies , Humans , Pandemics , Referral and Consultation , Retrospective Studies , SARS-CoV-2 , United Kingdom/epidemiology
3.
Chin J Traumatol ; 25(3): 161-165, 2022 May.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-1487654

ABSTRACT

PURPOSE: The COVID-19 pandemic has caused 1.4 million deaths globally and is associated with a 3-4 times increase in 30-day mortality after a fragility hip fracture with concurrent COVID-19 infection. Typically, death from COVID-19 infection occurs between 15 and 22 days after the onset of symptoms, but this period can extend up to 8 weeks. This study aimed to assess the impact of concurrent COVID-19 infection on 120-day mortality after a fragility hip fracture. METHODS: A multi-centre prospective study across 10 hospitals treating 8% of the annual burden of hip fractures in England between 1st March and 30th April, 2020 was performed. Patients whose surgical treatment was payable through the National Health Service Best Practice Tariff mechanism for "fragility hip fractures" were included in the study. Patients' 120-day mortality was assessed relative to their peri-operative COVID-19 status. Statistical analysis was performed using SPSS version 27. RESULTS: A total of 746 patients were included in this study, of which 87 (11.7%) were COVID-19 positive. Mortality rates at 30- and 120-day were significantly higher for COVID-19 positive patients relative to COVID-19 negative patients (p < 0.001). However, mortality rates between 31 and 120-day were not significantly different (p = 0.107), 16.1% and 9.4% respectively for COVID-19 positive and negative patients, odds ratio 1.855 (95% CI 0.865-3.978). CONCLUSION: Hip fracture patients with concurrent COVID-19 infection, provided that they are alive at day-31 after injury, have no significant difference in 120-day mortality. Despite the growing awareness and concern of "long-COVID" and its widespread prevalence, this does not appear to increase medium-term mortality rates after a hip fracture.


Subject(s)
COVID-19 , Hip Fractures , Hip Fractures/surgery , Humans , Pandemics , Prospective Studies , Retrospective Studies , State Medicine , United Kingdom/epidemiology
4.
Ir J Med Sci ; 191(3): 1005-1012, 2022 Jun.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-1286188

ABSTRACT

INTRODUCTION: COVID-19 has been recognized as the unprecedented global health crisis in modern times. The purpose of this study was to assess the impact of COVID-19 on treatment of neck of femur fractures (NOFF) against the current guidelines and meeting best practice key performance indicators (KPIs) according to the National Hip Fracture Database (NHFD) in two large central London hospitals. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A multi-center, longitudinal, retrospective, observational study of NOFF patients was performed for the first 'golden' month following the lockdown measures introduced in mid-March 2020. This was compared to the same time period in 2019. RESULTS: A total of 78 cases were observed. NOFFs accounted for 11% more of all acute referrals during the COVID era. There were fewer overall breaches in KPIs in time to theatre in 2020 and also for those awaiting an orthogeriatric review. Time to discharge from the trust during the pandemic was improved by 54% (p < 0.00001) but patients were 51% less likely to return to their usual residence (p = 0.007). The odds ratio was significantly higher for consultant surgeon-led operations and consultant orthogeriatric-led review in the post-COVID era. There was no significant difference in using aerosol-generating anaesthetic procedures or immortality rates between both years. CONCLUSION: The impact of COVID-19 pandemic has not adversely affected the KPIs for the treatment of NOFF patients with significant improvement in numerous care domains. These findings may represent the efforts to ensure that these vulnerable patients are treated promptly to minimize their risks from the coronavirus.


Subject(s)
COVID-19 , Hip Fractures , Orthopedics , Aged , COVID-19/epidemiology , Communicable Disease Control , Cough , Hip Fractures/epidemiology , Hip Fractures/surgery , Humans , London/epidemiology , Pandemics , Retrospective Studies
5.
Acta Orthop ; 91(6): 633-638, 2020 Dec.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-735647

ABSTRACT

Background and purpose - The COVID-19 pandemic has been recognised as an unprecedented global health crisis. This study assesses the impact on a large acute paediatric hospital service in London, evaluating the trends in the acute paediatric orthopaedic trauma referral caseload and operative casemix before (2019) and during (2020) COVID-19 lockdown. Patients and methods - A longitudinal retrospective observational prevalence study of both acute paediatric orthopaedic trauma referrals and operative caseload was performed for the first 6 "golden weeks" of lockdown. These data were compared with the same period in 2019. Statistical analyses included median (± median absolute deviation), risk and odds ratios as well as Fisher's exact test to calculate the statistical significance, set at p ≤ 0.05. Results - Acute paediatric trauma referrals in 2020 were reduced by two-thirds compared with 2019 (n = 302 vs. 97) with a halving risk (RR 0.55) and odds ratios (OR 0.43) of sporting-related mechanism of injuries (p = 0.002). There was a greater use of outpatient telemedicine in the COVID-19 period with more Virtual Fracture Clinic use (OR 97, RR 84, p < 0.001), and fewer patients being seen for consultation and followed up face to face (OR 0.55, RR 0.05, p < 0.001). Interpretation - The impact of the COVID-19 pandemic has led to a decline in the number of acute paediatric trauma referrals, admissions, and operations during the COVID period. There has also been a significant change in the patient pathway with more being reviewed via the means of telemedicine to reduce the risk of COVID-19 transmission and exposure. More work is required to observe for similar trends nationwide and globally as the pandemic has permanently affected the entire healthcare infrastructure.


Subject(s)
Athletic Injuries , COVID-19 , Communicable Disease Control/methods , Hospitals, Pediatric , Telemedicine , Wounds and Injuries , Athletic Injuries/epidemiology , Athletic Injuries/therapy , COVID-19/epidemiology , COVID-19/prevention & control , Child , Delivery of Health Care/trends , Female , Hospitalization/statistics & numerical data , Hospitals, Pediatric/organization & administration , Hospitals, Pediatric/statistics & numerical data , Humans , London/epidemiology , Male , Risk Management/organization & administration , SARS-CoV-2 , Telemedicine/methods , Telemedicine/organization & administration , Telemedicine/statistics & numerical data , Workload/statistics & numerical data , Wounds and Injuries/epidemiology , Wounds and Injuries/therapy
6.
Br J Hosp Med (Lond) ; 81(4): 1-6, 2020 Apr 02.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-159035

ABSTRACT

At first glance, the novel coronavirus pandemic and orthopaedic surgery appear separate entities. Orthopaedic surgeons are not generally considered front-line staff in terms of the treatment of the disease that the novel coronavirus causes compared with anaesthetic and medical colleagues. However, the impact that the novel coronavirus is likely to have on the musculoskeletal injury burden and the morbidity associated with chronic musculoskeletal disease is significant. This article summarises the strategies currently being developed for the remodelling of orthopaedic services in the UK and the emergency British Orthopaedic Association Standards for Trauma and Orthopaedic guidelines released on 24 March 2020 in managing urgent orthopaedic patients during the novel coronavirus pandemic.


Subject(s)
Coronavirus Infections/epidemiology , Musculoskeletal Diseases/therapy , Orthopedics/organization & administration , Pneumonia, Viral/epidemiology , Betacoronavirus , COVID-19 , Chronic Disease , Education, Medical/organization & administration , Elective Surgical Procedures/methods , Emergency Service, Hospital/organization & administration , Fractures, Bone/surgery , Humans , Musculoskeletal Diseases/surgery , Operating Rooms/organization & administration , Orthopedic Procedures/methods , Orthopedics/education , Pandemics , Pediatrics/organization & administration , Radiology/organization & administration , SARS-CoV-2 , United Kingdom , Workforce/organization & administration , Wounds and Injuries/surgery
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL